Guidance to licensing authorities The process for issuing casino premises licences

The additional annual cost per premises is an average across all premises types and in reality, will differ depending on the type of licence held. The additional annual cost per premises and the total additional annual funding for licensing authorities has been estimated using existing premises numbers. We believe it is appropriate to increase these fees so that local authorities can cover the costs of their gambling licensing and enforcement activity, and increase activity where needed. They are therefore essential for ensuring that licensing authorities can properly regulate gambling in their areas.

Our experts test and review casino, betting, and bingo sites so you don’t play in a bodged-up joint that’s all mouth and no trousers. Bojoko is your home for all online gambling in the United Kingdom. The UKGC is a strict licensor and regulator, meaning that licensed casinos must be provably safe. You can tell if a casino has a UK licence by checking the bottom of the casino website. You can find UK licensed casinos by using reputable sources, such as Bojoko, which has casino experts who review and verify each casino personally. Having a valid UKGC gambling license is a requirement for operating a gambling website that allows British players to join.

When granting applications to vary a premises licence, the licensing authority is reminded to ensure that all the appropriate licences and notices are issued with any updated information in respect of changes made by the Regulations, for example in relation to mandatory and default conditions. This would require a premises licence variation application to the relevant licensing authority given the changes to the gambling and non-gambling areas. For non-remote betting facilities, this would be a non-remote general betting (standard) operating licence. This guidance provides information on the overall intent of the statutory instruments, what the changes mean for operators of casino premises that intend to make use of the regulatory changes and how this process should be administered by licensing authorities when applications are received. Other converted casino premises where the gambling area is less than 280m² will be limited to a maximum of 16 separate betting positions. It cannot be enforced against non-extended casinos, but when calculating the number of machines against the maximum of 80, all machines in every connected converted casino will be counted, whether or not they have decided to exercise the extended entitlement.

Impact on gambling participation among under-18s

It will not be possible for a casino licensee to rely on an ancillary remote betting licence, even where SSBTs are available alongside a non-remote offering, as the ancillary remote betting licence is bound to a betting premises licence. To offer self-service betting terminals (SSBTs), casinos would be required to apply for a remote general betting (standard) (real events) licence. Licence holders should also consider whether, as a result of the changes and gambling facilities offered, an operating licence (OL) variation is required with regards to fee category and/or the licensed activities being offered (such as betting). As well as a fixed numerical maximum, the number of gaming machines must not exceed a specified multiple of the number of gaming tables used in that casino (Regulation 3 of the 2009 Regulations addresses when a gaming table is to be treated as being used in a casino at a particular time) This enables the holder of a converted casino premises licence who wants to utilise the new entitlements to apply to the relevant licensing authority to vary that licence so the casino plan can show the location and extent of any part of the premises which will be a table gaming area.

(3) Subject to sub-paragraph (4), in determining the floor area of the table gaming area, any number of separate areas within the premises may be taken into account. (2) The premises must contain a table gaming area, the floor area of which is no less than the lesser of— “(1) This paragraph applies to larger converted casino premises.”, and

Evidence was received in response to the land-based gambling consultation and through an additional supplementary consultation which focused on this reform specifically. Further details of proposed new operating licence fees will follow in due course. Operators will also need to be able to demonstrate that their new gambling and non-gambling areas abide by the updated rules in the Mandatory and Default Conditions, which will include the sliding scale and other restrictions on the sizes of different areas of the casino. As set out in section 151 of the 2005 Act and in the Gambling Act 2005 (Premises Licences and Provisional Statements) Regulations 2007, the operator will also need to submit an up-to-date plan showing their table gaming area, other gambling areas and non-gambling areas.

In addition to this, a large number of policy documents relating to casino and general gambling operations must be designed. Operating licences are issued by the UK Gambling Commission, the overall industry regulator and ‘watchdog’. While this is an act of the UK Parliament certain aspects of gambling laws are dealt with differently in Scotland because of a separate legal system and a slightly different approach in relation to local licensing. The operation of casinos in England, Scotland and Wales is governed by the Gambling Act 2005, which came into force on 1 September 2007. As we said earlier, playing at a licensed online casino comes with lots of advantages, including fair games, player protection, and the safety of your funds. Aside from issuing licenses to operators who want to offer gambling services to residents, it also helps to regulate their activities to ensure player protection and fair play across the country.

Best UKGC Licensed Casinos 2026

For 1968 Act casinos that access the new machine entitlements, we propose that the mandatory licence conditions remain aligned, so that only areas that comprise 12.5% of the minimum required table gaming area can be taken into account in determining the table gaming area. We will also amend the current inconsistency in the regulations which requires Small 2005 Act casinos to have a table gaming area of at least 500sqm (identical to their minimum overall gambling area) by reducing this requirement to 250sqm. This restriction, alongside requirements for non-gambling area, will only apply to those 1968 Act casinos that decide to exercise the enhanced gaming machine entitlement. Only casinos that have a gambling area of 280sqm or more will be eligible to access the enhanced gaming machine entitlement. As gaming machine allowances and machine to table ratios for 1968 Act casinos and Small 2005 Act casinos converge, more consistent size requirements should apply across the two types of licence to ensure a degree of fairness and consistency.

We are also proposing that this minimum transaction time applies to all machines. The vast majority of respondents agreed that there should be a minimum transaction time for customers making a cashless transaction on a gaming machine. Category D machines do not have a committed payment limit. The committed payment limits are £10 for Category B1, B2, B3 and B3A machines, and £5 for Category B4 and C machines. The deposit limits are currently set at £20 for Category B and C machines, and £2 for Category D machines. This could include looking at how customers interact with machines that accept cashless payments, how much they spend and the impact of different protections.

This indicates that an applicant poses a substantial risk to the licensing objectives; or there are significant concerns about an applicant’s suitability; or there is a risk of significant non-compliance with the requirements of the Act and the Commission’s LCCP. There is a positive obligation on applicants to show that they are able to satisfy the licensing objectives. In some circumstances the Commission may attach specific conditions to the licence, which may, for example, have the effect of restricting the activities that may be carried out in reliance on the licence. On considering an application for a licence the Commission is required to grant it, refuse it or grant it in respect of one or more of the specified activities and refuse it in respect of the others. However, the responsibility for taking the lead in developing and updating measures designed to protect the licensing objectives lies principally with an operator.

The application process begins online. This rule was introduced following the UK government’s gambling white paper and is aimed at reducing gambling-related harm. These changes focus on player protection, corporate accountability, and industry funding for gambling harm initiatives. The UK gambling industry is evolving, and 2025 has brought some of the most significant regulatory reforms in over a decade. Selecting the correct license type is essential because operating outside the scope of your license can lead to fines, enforcement action, or even license suspension.

There have been substantial changes to how consumers make payments in society since the ban on direct debit card use on gaming machines. Measures that we are seeking views on are intended to address inconsistencies between the different types of casino licence, as well as levelling the playing field to an extent between land-based and online operators. The UKGC issues licenses for both physical (non-remote) and online (remote) casinos, each tailored to specific operations.

Casinos with multiple licences at the same physical location could site more than 80 machines under the new regime – it is not clear whether the current rules are clear enough to prevent this situation from arising in practice. It is our intention that these casinos can continue to operate under the existing regime, whereby they are permitted no more than 20 machines where at least one is of Category B (or they may elect to have any number of Category C or D machines instead). Each should have its own casino premises licence and its own principal entrance from a street, and it must not be possible to enter one of them from other gambling premises. Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Gambling Act 2005 (Mandatory and Default Conditions) (England and Wales) Regulations 2007 sets out a number of mandatory conditions that are attached to all casino premises licences. Currently, a number of 1968 Act casinos operate more than one premises licence at the same physical location. The number of gaming products that land-based casinos can provide will always be constrained by physical space in a way that online casinos are not, but this is made worse by the existing caps on numbers.

An “economic crime levy” is payable by entities that are regulated for anti-money laundering purposes (currently only casinos in the UK) and which generate more than £10.2 million in UK revenue. It should be noted that in April 2025 HM Treasury opened a consultation (which closed on 21 July 2025) on a proposal to introduce a single remote gambling duty that would apply to all remote gambling activities targeting the UK. 15% of the commission charges charged by betting exchanges to users who are UK citizens Operating licences are generally indefinite, subject to paying annual fees.

However, it would be disruptive and potentially impose additional costs onto those casinos with a gambling area of 1,500sqm or more that are already established. For 1968 Act casinos that have a smaller gambling area, the requirements set out in the sliding scale will apply. Relaxing the machine to table ratio for Small 2005 Act casinos and applying it to 1968 Act casinos that take up their new machine entitlements is also a tested concept as it is already in place in Large 2005 Act casinos. No machine to table ratio currently exists for 1968 Act casinos.

• With regard to venues currently operating with a gambling area of 1500sqm or more, the strongest preference from consultation respondents was for these venues to be made to reduce their gambling area below 1500sqm.
• The combination of the Gambling Act 2005, the LCCP, the RTS, and the 2023 White Paper reforms has produced a framework that places significant compliance demands on operators — but also provides consumers with a high degree of protection.
• In addition, Small 2005 Act casinos which take advantage of the new machine to table ratio, and/or the reduced minimum table gaming area, will also need to apply to their local licensing authority to vary their premises licence, given the changes in non-gambling and gambling areas.
• What do you think are the potential impacts of raising licence fees on gambling companies?
• For a remote casino operator with GGY above £1 billion, the annual fee is £793,729 plus £125,000 for each complete additional £500 million of GGY above £1 billion.

If we required ‘cash-out’ slot-style Category D machines to be moved to age-restricted areas in licensed FECs, it is likely that operators would no longer site these machines. Unlicensed FECs are entitled to make only Category D machines available, once they have successfully applied for a permit from the licensing authority (local authority in England and Wales, licensing board in Scotland). However, Category C machines must be in a segregated part of the premises that is supervised to prevent children and young people accessing those machines. Licensed operators are required to place Category B and C machines in age-restricted areas to ensure that under-18s do not have access to them. This change will not casinos not on gamstop only strengthen the existing voluntary commitment from industry, by making it an offence to allow under-18s to play this type of gaming machine, it will also level the field between operators who are signed up to the voluntary code and those who are not.

The UKGC is the body tasked with regulating gambling activities in the UK. Doing this will save you from signing up for operators that aren’t reputable. Keep limits realistic and seek support if gambling stops feeling controlled. Withdrawal times depend on the casino and payment method.

A ‘mixed session’ is a single session that takes place on games of different machine categories. These rates are lower than the majority of other gambling products, although remain above the at-risk and problem gambling rates for ‘any gambling activity’. These represent transition costs which are expected to be incurred in the first few years of implementation, with exact timescales depending on the option taken forward.

This means that many FEC operators do not currently have age-controlled areas and would have to invest in creating such an area for what is a low stake product. This view was most strongly argued by licensing authorities. We will also work with the relevant trade bodies and operators to understand the feasibility of implementing voluntary test purchasing to help understand whether operators are abiding by this new restriction. This is an important measure to create a clear distinction between gambling products for adults and lower risk products accessible to children (such as crane grabbers or coin pushers) which have non-cash prizes or are entirely unlike adult gambling products. The majority of responses were in favour of an age restriction.